🤖

Live AI category

Agentic AI

AI that plans, uses tools and completes multi-step work

Agentic AI goes beyond answering prompts. These products plan work, operate tools or computers, create deliverables and recover from intermediate failures—with different charges for subscriptions, credits, model calls, runtime and actions.

Where it creates value

Common agentic ai workflows

Autonomous research and analysis

Documents, spreadsheets and presentations

Browser and computer-use workflows

Scheduled monitoring

Enterprise customer and employee agents

Multi-agent application development

What creates the bill

Landed-cost drivers

1

Credits or actions per attempt

2

Model, browser and sandbox runtime

3

Connectors and external APIs

4

Failure, retry and escalation rate

5

Human approval and repair

6

Unused monthly capacity

Tracked products

Tools now covered in Agentic AI

Pricing is shown in its native unit and then normalised through cost per accepted outcome. Public affiliate availability never determines a tool's ranking.

Manus

Manus · Autonomous general-purpose agent

Verified 2026-07-21

Subscription plus task credits

Free and paid credit plans; task complexity determines consumption.

Best for

Research, websites, slides, scheduled tasks and multi-step deliverables

Cost trap: Comparing included credits without measuring accepted deliverables.

ChatGPT Work

OpenAI · Knowledge-work agent

Verified 2026-07-21

Eligible paid-plan usage plus additional credits

Long-running Work tasks use plan capacity and can draw on purchased credits.

Best for

Documents, spreadsheets, presentations, reports, Sites and connected apps

Cost trap: Treating included access as zero-cost unlimited work.

Claude Cowork

Anthropic · Knowledge-work and file agent

Verified 2026-07-21

Included with paid Claude plans

Practical capacity follows the limits of the selected Claude plan.

Best for

Document assembly, file synthesis and structured knowledge work

Cost trap: Ignoring verification and repair time for high-consequence output.

Perplexity Computer

Perplexity · Search-native digital worker

Verified 2026-07-21

Subscription plus credits

Computer consumes credits based on task complexity; allocations vary by plan.

Best for

Cited research, connected-app tasks, asset creation and monitoring

Cost trap: Counting a completed run before its claims and actions are verified.

Genspark Super Agent

Genspark · Multi-tool super agent

Verified 2026-07-21

Subscription plus credits

Individual and team plans combine specialist agents with a shared credit allowance.

Best for

Research, slides, sheets, documents, design, coding and communications

Cost trap: Using one broad agent for every task without measuring specialist output quality.

Microsoft Copilot Studio

Microsoft · Enterprise agent builder

Verified 2026-07-21

Prepaid Copilot Credits or pay-as-you-go

Capacity and pay-as-you-go options meter agent actions and usage.

Best for

Microsoft 365, Power Platform and external-channel agents

Cost trap: Buying capacity before estimating credits per resolved workflow.

Salesforce Agentforce

Salesforce · CRM-native enterprise agent platform

Verified 2026-07-21

Flex Credits, conversations or user licensing

Pricing can be based on credits, actions, conversations or user packaging.

Best for

Customer service, sales and employee workflows in Salesforce

Cost trap: Optimising action price while ignoring implementation and unresolved cases.

Amazon Bedrock AgentCore

AWS · Managed agent runtime and operations platform

Verified 2026-07-21

Modular consumption pricing

Runtime, browser, memory, gateway, identity, evaluation and observability are charged separately.

Best for

Operating custom production agents on AWS

Cost trap: Comparing model tokens while omitting the operational service stack.

Google Agent Development Kit

Google · Open-source agent framework

Verified 2026-07-21

Open-source framework plus infrastructure usage

No framework licence fee; landed cost comes from models, tools, hosting and operations.

Best for

Code-first agent and multi-agent development

Cost trap: Calling the framework free while excluding production infrastructure and labour.

n8n

n8n · Workflow automation and agent platform

Verified 2026-07-21

Cloud subscription or self-hosted infrastructure

Cloud plans meter workflow executions; self-hosting shifts cost into infrastructure and operations.

Best for

Developer-controlled AI workflows, agents and integrations

Cost trap: Calling self-hosting free while omitting maintenance, upgrades and incident support.

Make

Make · Visual automation and AI-agent platform

Verified 2026-07-21

Subscription plus execution credits

Plans scale by monthly credits, with most workflow module actions consuming credits.

Best for

Visual workflows, app integration and accessible AI automation

Cost trap: Comparing monthly credits without calculating credits per successful business workflow.

Taskade

Taskade · AI agents, automation and app builder

Verified 2026-07-21

Subscription plus AI credits

Plans bundle seats, AI credits, agents, automations and the Genesis app builder.

Best for

Small-team agents, workflows, collaborative projects and prompt-built apps

Cost trap: Buying a high-credit tier before proving recurring agent and automation usage.

Browse AI

Browse AI · Browser automation and web-data agent

Verified 2026-07-21

Subscription plus extraction credits

Plans meter websites, credits and task volume; difficult sites can consume more credits.

Best for

No-code scraping, monitoring, website-to-spreadsheet and data workflows

Cost trap: Using cost per robot run instead of cost per accepted clean dataset or alert.

Buttons are marked sponsored only after an approved tracking URL is stored. Until then they are plain official product links. Disclosure.

FAQ

Questions about agentic ai

What makes AI agentic?+

An agent pursues an objective across multiple steps, invokes tools, observes results and continues until a stopping condition. Autonomy is a spectrum; one model call is not automatically an agent.

How should AI-agent prices be compared?+

Use cost per accepted completed task. Include subscription, credits, model usage, runtime, tools, retries and human approval or repair.

Is an autonomous agent always cheaper than a person?+

No. Agents can be economical for bounded repeatable work, but vague tasks, unreliable tools and expensive review can make them costlier.

Why keep coding agents separate?+

Coding agents are agentic, but repository access, testing, review and accepted engineering outcomes create a distinct buying and cost model.

Continue comparing

Choose the economic system first

Six kinds of Agentic AI create six different bills

Do not compare credits with tokens or seats with executions. Start with the architecture that matches the job, then calculate subscriptions, usage, retries, runtime, human review and accepted outcomes in one landed-cost model.

The common denominator: cost per accepted outcome

Add platform, model, tool, runtime, retry, infrastructure and human-review costs. Divide by work that passes the written acceptance checklist. For multi-agent systems, also show the coordination tax against an equivalent single-agent design.

subscriptioncredittokentool callbrowser minuteexecutionagent runseatreview hour

Not sure which AI is cheapest for your use case? Find out in 30 seconds — no signup required.

AI cost intelligence

Stop overpaying for AI tools

Join the OverpayingForAI list for pricing updates, cheaper alternatives, and practical buying guidance.

Now tracking 50+ AI tools, models, platforms, subscriptions, coding tools, and automation products.

We use your email only for OverpayingForAI updates. Unsubscribe anytime.