OverpayingForAIPricing desk

Classify · 1 checks · max 200 tokens · benched 2026-09-16

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B vs Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout on single message intent

Meta models side by side on "Single message intent": Llama 4 Scout scores 10/10; Llama 4 Scout is the cheapest answer scoring 8+ at $0.01 per 1,000 runs. Outputs, checks, judge reasons, latency and cost.

The prompt every model received

System

You are a classifier. Reply with exactly one label and nothing else.

User

Choose the single best intent for the message from this list: cancel_subscription, upgrade_plan, billing_question, technical_issue, other. Reply with only the label.

Message: "Hi, my card was charged $49 on the 3rd but my plan page says I'm on the $29 tier. Which one am I actually paying for?"

Rubric for the judge: Exactly the label billing_question with no punctuation or explanation.

Side by side

Every cell is one OpenRouter call at temperature 0 with the prompt's token cap and reasoning effort "low" where the model supports it. Cost is usage × the catalogue rate in models.json. Quality is one judge call to anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 against the prompt's rubric, cached per prompt version.

Muse Spark 1.3

meta/muse-spark-1.3

unjudged
failed: OpenRouter HTTP 403: This model requires you to complete the following before use: 18+ age confirmation. Confirm at https://openrouter.ai/settings/preferences.
Latency
0ms
Cost
$0
Per 1,000
$0

0 in · 0 out · 0 words · checks 0/1

  • exact
(empty output)

Judge:

Muse Glimmer 30B

meta/muse-glimmer-30b

10/10
Latency
101ms
Cost
$0.00014
Per 1,000
$0.14

109 in · 96 out (98 reasoning) · 1 words · checks 1/1

  • exact
billing_question

Judge: Output is exactly 'billing_question' with no punctuation or explanation, perfectly matching the rubric requirements.

Llama 4 Maverick

meta-llama/llama-4-maverick

10/10
Latency
288ms
Cost
$2.1e-5
Per 1,000
$0.02

97 in · 3 out · 1 words · checks 1/1

  • exact
billing_question

Judge: Output is exactly 'billing_question' with no punctuation or explanation, perfectly matching the rubric requirements.

Llama 4 Scout

meta-llama/llama-4-scout

10/10
top judge scorecheapest scoring 8+
Latency
1.8s
Cost
$1.1e-5
Per 1,000
$0.01

97 in · 3 out · 1 words · checks 1/1

  • exact
billing_question

Judge: Output is exactly 'billing_question' with no punctuation or explanation, perfectly matching the rubric requirements.

Frequently asked

What does this prompt test?

Classify: Exactly the label billing_question with no punctuation or explanation. The deterministic checks are exact.

Which model should I pick for this task?

If the judge's bar of 8/10 is good enough for you, Llama 4 Scout at $0.01 per 1,000 runs. If you need the top score, Llama 4 Scout at $0.01 per 1,000 runs.

If our calculators helped you cut down on hidden AI wallet leaks, thanks for using them. A tiny fraction of your savings is what keeps our pricing indexes updated daily.

Not sure which AI is cheapest for your use case? Find out in 30 seconds — no signup required.

AI cost intelligence

Stop overpaying for AI tools

Join the OverpayingForAI list for pricing updates, cheaper alternatives, and practical buying guidance.

Now tracking 50+ AI tools, models, platforms, subscriptions, coding tools, and automation products.

We use your email only for OverpayingForAI updates. Unsubscribe anytime.