Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K2.5 on emit a calendar tool call
Moonshotai models side by side on "Emit a calendar tool call": Kimi K2.5 scores 10/10; Kimi K2.5 is the cheapest answer scoring 8+ at $0.57 per 1,000 runs. Outputs, checks, judge reasons, latency and cost.
The prompt every model received
System
You are a function-calling engine. Reply with JSON only, no prose, no code fences.
User
You have one tool:
{"name": "create_event", "parameters": {"title": "string", "start": "ISO 8601 date-time without timezone, e.g. 2026-01-31T09:00", "duration_minutes": "integer", "attendees": "array of email strings"}}
Produce the tool call for this user message as a JSON object of the shape {"name": string, "arguments": object}.
User: Book a 45-minute design review with [email protected] and [email protected] on 2 October 2026 at 3pm.
Rubric for the judge: Correct tool name, ISO start 2026-10-02T15:00, integer duration 45, both attendees in an array, a sensible title.
Side by side
Every cell is one OpenRouter call at temperature 0 with the prompt's token cap and reasoning effort "low" where the model supports it. Cost is usage × the catalogue rate in models.json. Quality is one judge call to anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 against the prompt's rubric, cached per prompt version.
Judge: All rubric criteria met: correct tool name, proper ISO 8601 start datetime, integer duration of 45 minutes, both attendees in array format, and sensible title.
Kimi K2.7 Code
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code
10/10
Latency
610ms
Cost
$0.00073
Per 1,000
$0.73
156 in · 176 out (105 reasoning) · 13 words · checks 7/7
Judge: All rubric criteria met: correct tool name, proper ISO 8601 start datetime, integer duration of 45 minutes, both attendees in array format, and sensible title.
Kimi K2.6
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
4/10
Latency
609ms
Cost
$0.00175
Per 1,000
$1.75
156 in · 400 out (328 reasoning) · 2 words · checks 4/7
Judge: Output is incomplete/truncated (attendees array cut off mid-email), but the visible parts show correct tool name, start time, duration, and title format.
Kimi K2.5
moonshotai/kimi-k2.5
10/10
top judge scorecheapest scoring 8+
Latency
2.9s
Cost
$0.00057
Per 1,000
$0.57
156 in · 224 out (166 reasoning) · 13 words · checks 7/7
Judge: All rubric criteria met: correct tool name, proper ISO 8601 start datetime, integer duration of 45 minutes, both attendees in array format, and sensible title.
Frequently asked
▸What does this prompt test?
Tool call: Correct tool name, ISO start 2026-10-02T15:00, integer duration 45, both attendees in an array, a sensible title. The deterministic checks are json_valid, json_keys, regex, contains, regex, contains, contains.
▸Which model should I pick for this task?
If the judge's bar of 8/10 is good enough for you, Kimi K2.5 at $0.57 per 1,000 runs. If you need the top score, Kimi K2.5 at $0.57 per 1,000 runs.
If our calculators helped you cut down on hidden AI wallet leaks, thanks for using them. A tiny fraction of your savings is what keeps our pricing indexes updated daily.
Not sure which AI is cheapest for your use case? Find out in 30 seconds — no signup required.