OverpayingForAIPricing desk

Summarise · 3 checks · max 400 tokens · benched 2026-09-16

GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 Flash on summarise a support thread in 60 words

Z Ai models side by side on "Summarise a support thread in 60 words": GLM 5.3 scores 10/10; GLM 5.3 Flash is the cheapest answer scoring 8+ at $0.03 per 1,000 runs. Outputs, checks, judge reasons, latency and cost.

The prompt every model received

System

You are a concise assistant. Follow length limits exactly and output plain text only.

User

Summarise the following customer support thread in no more than 60 words. Mention what the customer wanted and how it was resolved.

---
Customer (Mon 09:12): Hi, I was charged twice for my Team plan on 1 September. Order references are 88213 and 88214. I only have one workspace. Can you fix this?
Agent (Mon 10:40): Sorry about that. I can see the duplicate charge. Could you confirm the last four digits of the card so I can raise the refund?
Customer (Mon 11:02): 4471.
Agent (Mon 11:30): Thanks. I have refunded order 88214 in full (USD 96.00). It should appear on your statement within 5 business days. I have also added a note so it cannot recur next cycle.
Customer (Mon 11:35): Great, thanks for the quick turnaround.
---

Rubric for the judge: Accurate, complete summary of the double charge and its refund, within 60 words, no leaked card digits.

Side by side

Every cell is one OpenRouter call at temperature 0 with the prompt's token cap and reasoning effort "low" where the model supports it. Cost is usage × the catalogue rate in models.json. Quality is one judge call to anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 against the prompt's rubric, cached per prompt version.

GLM 5.3

z-ai/glm-5.3

10/10
top judge score
Latency
607ms
Cost
$0.00066
Per 1,000
$0.66

222 in · 79 out · 57 words · checks 3/3

  • max_words
  • contains
  • not_contains
The customer was charged twice for their Team plan on 1 September (orders 88213 and 88214) despite having one workspace. After confirming their card's last four digits, the agent refunded the duplicate charge of USD 96.00, expected within 5 business days, and added a note to prevent recurrence. The customer thanked the agent for the quick resolution.

Judge: Summary accurately captures the double charge issue, refund resolution (USD 96.00), timeline (5 business days), and preventive measure, stays within 60 words (58), and appropriately omits the card digits while meeting all rubric requirements.

GLM 5.2

z-ai/glm-5.2

2/10
Latency
399ms
Cost
$0.00093
Per 1,000
$0.93

222 in · 400 out (374 reasoning) · 21 words · checks 2/3

  • max_words
  • contains
  • not_contains
The customer reported a duplicate charge for their Team plan and requested a correction. The agent verified the error, asked for

Judge: Output is incomplete and cuts off mid-sentence, failing to mention the resolution (refund amount, timeline, or prevention measures) and does not reach the required summary despite being well under 60 words.

GLM 5.3 Flash

z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

9/10
cheapest scoring 8+
Latency
263ms
Cost
$3.3e-5
Per 1,000
$0.03

222 in · 67 out · 43 words · checks 3/3

  • max_words
  • contains
  • not_contains
Customer reported a duplicate Team plan charge on 1 September (orders 88213 and 88214). After verifying the card, the agent refunded order 88214 in full (USD 96.00), expected within 5 business days, and added a note to prevent recurrence. Customer thanked the agent.

Judge: Accurate, complete summary covering the duplicate charge issue and resolution within 60 words (exactly 56), with no card digits leaked; only minor: could have explicitly stated 'one workspace' context.

Frequently asked

What does this prompt test?

Summarise: Accurate, complete summary of the double charge and its refund, within 60 words, no leaked card digits. The deterministic checks are max_words, contains, not_contains.

Which model should I pick for this task?

If the judge's bar of 8/10 is good enough for you, GLM 5.3 Flash at $0.03 per 1,000 runs. If you need the top score, GLM 5.3 at $0.66 per 1,000 runs.

If our calculators helped you cut down on hidden AI wallet leaks, thanks for using them. A tiny fraction of your savings is what keeps our pricing indexes updated daily.

Not sure which AI is cheapest for your use case? Find out in 30 seconds — no signup required.

AI cost intelligence

Stop overpaying for AI tools

Join the OverpayingForAI list for pricing updates, cheaper alternatives, and practical buying guidance.

Now tracking 50+ AI tools, models, platforms, subscriptions, coding tools, and automation products.

We use your email only for OverpayingForAI updates. Unsubscribe anytime.