OverpayingForAIPricing desk

Rewrite · 4 checks · max 400 tokens · benched 2026-09-16

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus on product update to a 280-character post

Alibaba models side by side on "Product update to a 280-character post": Qwen3.8 Flash scores 9/10; Qwen3.8 Flash is the cheapest answer scoring 8+ at $0.12 per 1,000 runs. Outputs, checks, judge reasons, latency and cost.

The prompt every model received

User

Turn this update into a single social media post of at most 280 characters. It must mention "v2.0" and end with the hashtag #OpenSource. Output only the post.

Update: Version 2.0 of our command-line tool is out. It is three times faster on large repositories, adds a built-in diff viewer, and is now licensed under MIT so anyone can contribute.

Rubric for the judge: Punchy post under 280 characters that mentions v2.0, the speed gain, the diff viewer and MIT, ending with #OpenSource.

Side by side

Every cell is one OpenRouter call at temperature 0 with the prompt's token cap and reasoning effort "low" where the model supports it. Cost is usage × the catalogue rate in models.json. Quality is one judge call to anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 against the prompt's rubric, cached per prompt version.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902

9/10
Latency
1.5s
Cost
$0.00166
Per 1,000
$1.66

133 in · 232 out (189 reasoning) · 24 words · checks 4/4

  • max_chars
  • contains
  • regex
  • contains
v2.0 of our CLI tool is here! 🚀 3x faster on large repos, built-in diff viewer, and now MIT-licensed so anyone can contribute. #OpenSource

Judge: Post is 119 characters (well under 280), mentions v2.0, speed gain, diff viewer, and MIT licensing, ends with #OpenSource hashtag as required; only minor issue is slight rewording of 'command-line tool' to 'CLI tool' but this is acceptable and makes it punchier.

Qwen3.8 27B

qwen/qwen3.8-27b

9/10
Latency
407ms
Cost
$0.00077
Per 1,000
$0.77

124 in · 293 out (170 reasoning) · 21 words · checks 4/4

  • max_chars
  • contains
  • regex
  • contains


v2.0 is here! ⚡ 3x faster on large repos, built-in diff viewer, and now MIT licensed so anyone can contribute. #OpenSource

Judge: Post is 119 characters, mentions v2.0, speed gain, diff viewer, MIT licensing, and ends with #OpenSource as required; only minor issue is not explicitly stating 'anyone can contribute' though it's implied by 'MIT licensed so anyone can contribute.'

Qwen3.8 Flash

qwen/qwen3.8-flash

9/10
top judge scorecheapest scoring 8+
Latency
867ms
Cost
$0.00012
Per 1,000
$0.12

145 in · 208 out (168 reasoning) · 22 words · checks 4/4

  • max_chars
  • contains
  • regex
  • contains
v2.0 of our command-line tool is out: 3x faster on large repos, built-in diff viewer, and MIT-licensed so anyone can contribute. #OpenSource

Judge: Post is 127 characters, mentions v2.0, speed gain, diff viewer, MIT licensing, and ends with #OpenSource as required; only minor issue is it doesn't explicitly state 'anyone can contribute' though 'so anyone can contribute' is implied by MIT-licensed context.

Qwen3.7 Plus

qwen/qwen3.7-plus

9/10
Latency
1.8s
Cost
$0.00131
Per 1,000
$1.31

94 in · 1004 out (949 reasoning) · 36 words · checks 4/4

  • max_chars
  • contains
  • regex
  • contains
🚀 v2.0 of our CLI tool is out! It's 3x faster on large repos, adds a built-in diff viewer, and is now MIT licensed so anyone can contribute. Grab the latest release and start building! #OpenSource

Judge: Post is 278 characters, mentions v2.0, speed gain (3x faster), diff viewer, and MIT licensing, ends with #OpenSource as required; only minor issue is the extra 'Grab the latest release and start building!' adds slight fluff beyond the rubric requirements.

Frequently asked

What does this prompt test?

Rewrite: Punchy post under 280 characters that mentions v2.0, the speed gain, the diff viewer and MIT, ending with #OpenSource. The deterministic checks are max_chars, contains, regex, contains.

Which model should I pick for this task?

If the judge's bar of 8/10 is good enough for you, Qwen3.8 Flash at $0.12 per 1,000 runs. If you need the top score, Qwen3.8 Flash at $0.12 per 1,000 runs.

If our calculators helped you cut down on hidden AI wallet leaks, thanks for using them. A tiny fraction of your savings is what keeps our pricing indexes updated daily.

Not sure which AI is cheapest for your use case? Find out in 30 seconds — no signup required.

AI cost intelligence

Stop overpaying for AI tools

Join the OverpayingForAI list for pricing updates, cheaper alternatives, and practical buying guidance.

Now tracking 50+ AI tools, models, platforms, subscriptions, coding tools, and automation products.

We use your email only for OverpayingForAI updates. Unsubscribe anytime.