OverpayingForAIPricing desk

Rewrite · 4 checks · max 400 tokens · benched 2026-09-16

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on product update to a 280-character post

DeepSeek models side by side on "Product update to a 280-character post": DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores 10/10; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheapest answer scoring 8+ at $0.19 per 1,000 runs. Outputs, checks, judge reasons, latency and cost.

The prompt every model received

User

Turn this update into a single social media post of at most 280 characters. It must mention "v2.0" and end with the hashtag #OpenSource. Output only the post.

Update: Version 2.0 of our command-line tool is out. It is three times faster on large repositories, adds a built-in diff viewer, and is now licensed under MIT so anyone can contribute.

Rubric for the judge: Punchy post under 280 characters that mentions v2.0, the speed gain, the diff viewer and MIT, ending with #OpenSource.

Side by side

Every cell is one OpenRouter call at temperature 0 with the prompt's token cap and reasoning effort "low" where the model supports it. Cost is usage × the catalogue rate in models.json. Quality is one judge call to anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 against the prompt's rubric, cached per prompt version.

DeepSeek V4 Pro

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

9/10
Latency
1.3s
Cost
$0.00124
Per 1,000
$1.24

87 in · 744 out (710 reasoning) · 20 words · checks 4/4

  • max_chars
  • contains
  • regex
  • contains
v2.0 of our CLI tool is here! 3x faster on large repos, built-in diff viewer, and now MIT licensed. #OpenSource

Judge: Post is 108 characters, mentions v2.0, speed gain, diff viewer, and MIT licensing, ends with #OpenSource as required, though it could have been slightly more punchy or emphasized the contribution aspect.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

9/10
Latency
470ms
Cost
$0.00126
Per 1,000
$1.26

167 in · 9342 out (9312 reasoning) · 20 words · checks 4/4

  • max_chars
  • contains
  • regex
  • contains
v2.0 of our CLI tool is out! 3x faster on large repos, built-in diff viewer, MIT licensed for contributions. #OpenSource

Judge: Post is 109 characters (well under 280), mentions v2.0, speed gain, diff viewer, MIT licensing, and ends with #OpenSource as required; only minor issue is it doesn't explicitly mention 'anyone can contribute' but the MIT licensing reference implies this.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash

10/10
top judge scorecheapest scoring 8+
Latency
246ms
Cost
$0.00019
Per 1,000
$0.19

112 in · 282 out (243 reasoning) · 23 words · checks 4/4

  • max_chars
  • contains
  • regex
  • contains
Our command-line tool v2.0 is out! 3x faster on large repos, plus a built-in diff viewer. Now MIT-licensed so anyone can contribute. #OpenSource

Judge: Post is 127 characters, mentions v2.0, speed gain (3x faster), diff viewer, MIT licensing, ends with #OpenSource, and is punchy and well-formatted.

Frequently asked

What does this prompt test?

Rewrite: Punchy post under 280 characters that mentions v2.0, the speed gain, the diff viewer and MIT, ending with #OpenSource. The deterministic checks are max_chars, contains, regex, contains.

Which model should I pick for this task?

If the judge's bar of 8/10 is good enough for you, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at $0.19 per 1,000 runs. If you need the top score, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at $0.19 per 1,000 runs.

If our calculators helped you cut down on hidden AI wallet leaks, thanks for using them. A tiny fraction of your savings is what keeps our pricing indexes updated daily.

Not sure which AI is cheapest for your use case? Find out in 30 seconds — no signup required.

AI cost intelligence

Stop overpaying for AI tools

Join the OverpayingForAI list for pricing updates, cheaper alternatives, and practical buying guidance.

Now tracking 50+ AI tools, models, platforms, subscriptions, coding tools, and automation products.

We use your email only for OverpayingForAI updates. Unsubscribe anytime.