OverpayingForAIPricing desk

Lesson 2 of 8 · 10 min read · Beginner → Intermediate

Llama models explained

Scout, Maverick, 3.3 70B, 3.1 8B, plus Meta's Muse models: what each is for, what it costs per token on hosted APIs, and how much context you get.

In this lesson you will

  • Name the current Meta models in our catalogue and what each is best at
  • Read a per-token price ladder and translate it into a monthly estimate
  • Choose a model size based on task difficulty rather than habit

Because Llama is open-weight, the "model family" is really a set of model files at different sizes. Bigger models are generally more capable and cost more per token to serve. Smaller models are cheaper and faster, and are good enough for a surprising amount of everyday work.

The chart below is live. It reads hosted-API rates from our catalogue, which are sourced from OpenRouter, and it updates whenever our pricing sync runs. Use it instead of any number you remember from a blog post.

Meta models: hosted API price per 1M tokensLive from the OverpayingForAI catalogue · last verified 2026-09-04 · sorted by output priceInputOutputMuse Spark 1.31.0M context$1.25$4.25Muse Glimmer 30B131K context$0.3$1.1Llama 4 Maverick1.0M context$0.2$0.696Llama 3.3 70B Instruct131K context$0.1$0.32Llama 4 Scout1.3M context$0.1$0.3Llama 3.1 8B Instruct131K context$0.05$0.08Batch, fast-mode and free variants are excluded. Prices change; the figure re-draws from the catalogue on every build.
Figure 1.Input and output price per million tokens for Meta models served through OpenRouter. Output tokens usually cost more than input tokens.

The lineup

Meta models in our catalogue and what they are for. Prices are on the live chart above.
ModelContext windowBest forNotes
Llama 4 Scout1,310,720 tokensLong documents, cheap general useLowest-priced Llama 4 model; very large context
Llama 4 Maverick1,048,576 tokensHarder tasks, better answersRoughly double Scout's per-token price
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct131,072 tokensProven workhorse for chat and writingSame input rate as Scout on OpenRouter at the time of writing
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct131,072 tokensClassification, extraction, bulk jobsCheapest model in the family; also easy to self-host
Muse Spark 1.31,048,576 tokensMeta's premium hosted modelPriced like a frontier model; check whether you need it
Muse Glimmer 30B131,072 tokensMid-priced hosted optionSits between Llama and Muse Spark on price

Llama vs Muse

Our catalogue lists two groups under Meta. The Llama models are the open-weight family you can download and run anywhere. The Muse Spark and Muse Glimmer models are listed as hosted-API products at much higher rates. At the time of writing Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens against $0.20 for Llama 4 Maverick, so treat Muse as a separate decision and only pay for it if a cheaper Llama model fails on your task.

Context windows

The context window is the maximum number of tokens the model can hold at once: your prompt, any documents you paste, and its reply. Llama 4 Scout and Maverick list windows above one million tokens in our catalogue. Llama 3.3 and 3.1 list 131,072 tokens, which is still around 100,000 words.

Two cautions. First, the window you actually get depends on the host: some serve a shorter window than the model supports. Second, a big window is a cost trap. Every token you send is billed, so pasting a 300-page PDF into every message can cost more than the answer is worth. Lesson 8 covers how to avoid that.

Knowledge check

You need to classify 50,000 short support tickets as cheaply as possible. Which model should you try first?

Lesson FAQ

What is the difference between Llama 4 Scout and Maverick?

Scout is the smaller, cheaper model with the larger listed context window. Maverick costs more per token and is meant for harder tasks. Try Scout first and upgrade only if you need to.

Is Llama 3.3 70B still worth using?

Yes. It is a proven model, widely hosted, and at the time of writing priced at the same input rate as Llama 4 Scout on OpenRouter. It is also a common self-hosting target.

Are the Muse models open-weight like Llama?

Our catalogue lists Muse Spark and Muse Glimmer as hosted-API products under Meta at much higher rates than Llama. Treat them as a separate, premium option and check Meta's official documentation for availability and terms.

Finished reading?

Mark it done to track your progress through the course.

Compare, calculate, decide — for Llama

If our calculators helped you cut down on hidden AI wallet leaks, consider buying us a coffee. A tiny fraction of your savings keeps our pricing indexes updated daily.

Not sure which AI is cheapest for your use case? Find out in 30 seconds — no signup required.

AI cost intelligence

Stop overpaying for AI tools

Join the OverpayingForAI list for pricing updates, cheaper alternatives, and practical buying guidance.

Now tracking 50+ AI tools, models, platforms, subscriptions, coding tools, and automation products.

We use your email only for OverpayingForAI updates. Unsubscribe anytime.