Job seekers get two things from AI that are worth having: a CV summary that mirrors the language of the ad, and a rehearsal partner that asks the questions the ad implies. They get one thing that is dangerous: a model that upgrades your experience without telling you. Both tasks below are built to stop that.
Task 1: a CV summary tailored to one ad
| Version | Summary | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Generic | Motivated professional with strong communication skills seeking a challenging role. | Says nothing the recruiter can match to the ad |
| Tailored | Customer support lead with 3 years handling B2B accounts, cut ticket backlog 40% by introducing a triage rota, comfortable with Zendesk and HubSpot. | Uses the ad's words (B2B, Zendesk) and your real numbers; nothing invented |
Your turn
Your turn: tailor the summary
Rewrite my CV summary for this job. Use the job ad's language where my experience genuinely matches. Do not add skills, tools, years or achievements that are not in my current summary. 3 sentences, under 70 words, first person without "I". MY CURRENT SUMMARY: [YOUR SUMMARY] JOB AD: [JOB AD]
Hint: "Do not add skills that are not in my current summary" is the line that keeps you honest. Then read the output and check it anyway.
Task 2: interview questions from the ad
The same ad tells you what the interview will ask. Every requirement in it ("cut churn", "priorities change weekly") is a question in disguise, and a model is good at turning requirements back into questions. Run this one as written; the ad is included.
Try it
Interview questions implied by the ad
Knowledge check
Your tailored summary now says "HubSpot certified". Your original summary said "some HubSpot". What happened, and what do you do?