An unconstrained "summarise this" gives you a paragraph that is 60 percent as long as the original and mentions everything equally. A summary is a set of choices, and if you do not say what to choose, the model chooses for a generic reader. Two words fix it: a number and a focus.
| You ask for | You get | Use it when |
|---|---|---|
| One sentence | "Terms for hiring a community hall: hourly rates, a $200 deposit, and a sliding cancellation policy." | Deciding whether to read it at all |
| Three bullets | Rates and minimum; deposit and its conditions; cancellation windows | Telling someone else what it says |
| Ten bullets, one per section | Every rule, in order, one line each | Replacing the document for daily use |
Your turn
Your reusable summary prompt
Summarise the document below in [NUMBER] bullet points. Each bullet under 20 words. Focus on [WHAT MATTERS MOST]. Use only what the document says. Document: [PASTE THE DOCUMENT]
Hint: Fewer bullets force the model to prioritise. If a three-bullet summary misses the thing you care about, the fix is the focus slot, not more bullets.
Try it
Three bullets, focused on money and deadlines
- Did it work? Three bullets, and every one of them mentions a dollar figure or a deadline. If a bullet is about capacity or noise, the focus was ignored — say it again, more bluntly: *"Ignore anything that is not about money or dates."*
- Now change one thing. Run it again with the focus set to *"anything a first-time hirer could get wrong."* Same document, different summary. That is the point: the document did not change, your question did.
Knowledge check
Your three-bullet summary of a 40-page report misses the one recommendation you needed. What is the best fix?